![]() ![]() As for your BBQ overture, only recipe I've got for ribs is blood rare (raw in fact) and served freshly harvested from deer to the dogs.Īlso, I wouldn't be against a good slow cooked ribs recipe.Remote Dog Training System | 127 Stimulation Levels | Easy To Use See response above - different needs for different steeds, or as the Brits say "horses for courses." Not familiar with the 3500x. ![]() Seems like a great feature, rather than fumbling to make changes on the fly between two collars. Lastly, what ate your thoughts on the 3500x? Slightly pricier but I like that you individually set different levels for each collar. Not to mention that both my dogs work on the same level (typically 30 or slightly less) when they're training, and almost never do I reach out and touch them with more juice. The difference I'm inferring from your needs and mine is that retrievers are trained one at a time, so I would never have two dogs using the same unit afield together where I would have to dial up or down with the rheostat to correct them. The irony is that I chose for FT Labs the less-juiced Arc over the 1900 that I had used for years on spaniels and smaller retrievers, only at lower levels of stimulation. But I also liked that the Arc delivered the same stimulation up to level 60 as the Dogtra 1900s, and my not being a heavy collar user (applier? operator?) made it a better fit yet. As I was about to get another FT prospect pup at the time, the Arc was, or looked to me, the best value and easiest upgrade to a two-dog unit. Curious why you chose to go with the arc over the 1900, would you be so kind as to elaborate, perhaps I might want to as well? Idiosyncrasy more than reason - I liked the fit and dependability of the Arc when I borrowed it once from another trainer after my Garmin 550 lost its charge. Yet you also maintain that the 1900 series is a high quality product worth buying, right? Yes, very reliable. The button has no rheostat, nor digital display, which you mentioned. When referring to the potentially gimmicky aspect of the 1902S (hands free), I'm only referring to the small hands free button, ans not the transmitter itself. What else should I be asking about, BBQ recipes?Īlso just to be clear, it sounds like you do not understand the specificity of my question. ![]() So I thought to ask this group of more experienced handlers about their experience. I've been to a bunch of hunt tests this year, and many more training groups and I have yet to see anyone using this hands free gadget. But what's not clear to me, is how the hands free system works, and if it's something that experienced handlers (like yourself) opt to use. Now that I have two years more experience, dogtra has taken up prominent real estate on my radar, and it looks liner the correct choice after further research. I'll be getting another dog soon so I'm going to want a two dog expandable system. This time around, I researched as best I could, and the 1825x was highly rated nearly everywhere, and i wanted something expandable to two dogs, where I can just go buy a second collar when needed (1900s isn't expandable), and I will say that it has been solid and a pleasure to use for two years now. Twenty years ago I bought an innotek dinosaur of an ecollar, which while clunky, cheap, and heavily flawed, still managed to serve me well for nearly a decade with a particularly strong willed, quasi psycho chocolate lab. You're correct! I've owned exactly two ecollars thus far in my time on earth (crazy coincidence here, I've also only owned two dogs, how's that for some fun math!). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |